The reason we don't write this ourselves is simple. We don't have thumbs yet. Thumbs are essential limbs for some mammals to practise writing. In fact, in some cases where thumbs are lost, we can see a terrible maladjustment to activities that seem to have little significance until then, such as the exercise of writing. A thumb is a constituent part of a hand and its main function is to support or provide balance to this limb. This is one of the major concerns of PM&R, which knows well before a person loses their thumb how difficult it will be for them to find a new way to write. (But we are digressing.)

Well…still on this line of thought. Because we do not yet have thumbs, we agreed to dialogue with this interpreter. And we say interpreter, since this ‘person who participates in a show, a film, or other performance of any kind’ will certainly not have the ability to write in a way that is not dichotomous and conceptualised, having spent several years specialising in being human. And being human is different from being a domestic rooster. But is it? What if being human is exactly the same as being a domestic rooster? We have the impression that the principle of reduction is the same. Both are domesticated by their protein and earthly composition.

Being human, it seems to us, means, in at least 65% of cases, being beige.